Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01571
Original file (BC 2013 01571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
               RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01571
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to show his service in the 
Thailand.

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

While stationed at Fairchild AFB, WA he was sent on Temporary 
Duty (TDY) to U-Tapao Air Base, Thailand in Dec 1968 into 1969.

He has health issues related to Agent Orange.  He  but cannot 
get Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) benefits as a Veteran 
of the Vietnam War because there is nothing annotated on his DD 
Form 214 that shows he was in Southeast Asia.  

His pay records should show flight and combat pay.

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD Form 214; extracts from his AF Form 7, Airman Military 
Record; Standard Form 88, Report of Medical Examination, and 
Special Order GB-558.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Air Force 
from 28 Dec 66 to 9 Dec 70.  His DD Form 214 reflects a total of 
3 years, 11 months, and 12 days of total active service, with 
1 year, 4 months, and 10 days of Foreign Service.

________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  DPAPP states that a review of the 
applicant’s Master Personnel Records (MPR) and evidence 
submitted failed to provide any documentation that would 
substantiate Foreign Service in Thailand.  

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In 1968, he went TDY to Kadena AFB, Japan for six months.  
Shortly thereafter, he received orders to U-Tapao, Thailand.

He provides a notarized statement from a former airman stating 
that he was stationed in Thailand with the applicant.  

He understands there was a fire in St. Louis and Air Force 
records were lost after 1969.  His SF 88 reflects a medical 
history in Thailand.  He resubmits the extract from his AF Form 
7 which reflects his combat missions in 1969.  

As a ground crew member of a KC-135 aircraft, he was on flying 
status and received combat pay due to combat missions.

It is concerning that he served his country for four years and 
was away from his home and family, and cannot be acknowledged 
for this service because someone dropped the ball on validating 
his records.

The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant 
partial relief.  We note that the office of primary 
responsibility recommends denial stating they were unable to 
substantiate Foreign Service in Thailand.  However, we find the 
medical documentation, witness statement, and extract from his 
AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, which reflects an aerial 
combat mission sufficient to conclude that he had boots on the 
ground in Thailand.  While the applicant requests his DD Form 
214 be corrected to reflect service in Thailand; in accordance 
with Department of Defense directives, the DD Form 214 will not 
be reissued or amended to reflect specific locations served in 
an AOR.  Therefore, in view of the above, we recommend his 
records be corrected to the extent indicated below.  

________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he had 
boots on the ground in Thailand.

________________________________________________________________


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-01571 in Executive Session on 9 Jan 14, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 Mar 13, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 11 Jul 13.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jul 13.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 6 Aug 13, w/atchs.



                                   
                                   Panel Chair
                                   












Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05218

    Original file (BC 2012 05218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP states that the Board should review the applicant’s records to see if Foreign Service other than what they were able to verify can be determined. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that his AF Form 7, Airman Military Record reflects he was TDY from 28...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03619

    Original file (BC 2013 03619.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03619 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his temporary duty (TDY) service in Thailand. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03791

    Original file (BC 2012 03791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 Nov 12, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant that after a complete review of his official military records and the documentation he provided, they were able to verify and confirm his boots on ground foreign service time in U-Tapao Air Base, Thailand, from 7 January 1969 to 26 February 1969, for 1 month, and 20 days, as well as his service at Ching Chuan Kang Air Base, Taiwan, from 20 January 1970 to 7 July 1970, for 5 months, and 18 days. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05724

    Original file (BC 2013 05724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05724 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for his foreign service in Thailand and Guam (Administratively corrected), and Okinawa. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03687

    Original file (BC-2010-03687.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of boots on ground in Vietnam, stating, in part, that the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation submitted failed to provide any evidence that substantiates foreign service time in Vietnam. While it is not conclusive that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam, we find the submitted evidence to be credible and consistent with his statements and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00335

    Original file (BC-2012-00335.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00335 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: 1) Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) (Will be administratively corrected to reflect the VSM w/one Bronze Service Star (VSM w/1BSS). We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01654

    Original file (BC-2006-01654.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Credit for service in Vietnam requires a member to have served (on ground or landed at least one day) in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01191

    Original file (BC 2014 01191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a personal letter to the board and states the USAF lost all of his personnel records when they sent him from Kadena AFB to Maxwell AFB for Retirement. Examiner’s Note: On 27 May 14 an inquiry letter was sent to AFPC/DPAPP requesting to adjust their advisory opinion in the following manner: “The applicant’s AF Form 7, Page 92 of his records reflects that he was in combat mission in Vietnam on 18 Oct 67. With respect to his request for his...